One-dimensional nonseparating plane continua with disjoint \(\epsilon\)- dense subcontinua (Q2639376): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4125468 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3209844 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Concerning Triodic Continua / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-8641(91)90014-d / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1999399389 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 08:39, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
One-dimensional nonseparating plane continua with disjoint \(\epsilon\)- dense subcontinua
scientific article

    Statements

    One-dimensional nonseparating plane continua with disjoint \(\epsilon\)- dense subcontinua (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1991
    0 references
    \textit{J. Krasinkiewicz} and \textit{P. Minc} [Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Sér. Sci. Math. Astron. Phys. 25, 283-289 (1977; Zbl 0354.54018)] showed that for any \(\lambda\)-dendroid X there is an \(\epsilon >0\) so that any two \(\epsilon\)-dense subcontinua of X must intersect. In this paper that result is extended to one-dimensional nonseparating plane triods, and this is used to show that any one-dimensional nonseparating plane continuum which, for each \(\epsilon >0\), has two disjoint \(\epsilon\)- dense subcontinua is either indecomposable or the union of two indecomposable continua. \textit{Knaster}, in private communication in 1972, asked whether each plane continuum which is the closure of a ray that limits on itself must contain an indecomposable continuum. \textit{D. Bellamy} and \textit{J. Krasinkiewicz} answered the question negatively in 1976 with a hereditarily decomposable example. In this paper it is shown that if such a continuum separates the plane into only finitely many components, then it must contain an indecomposable continuum, and if the continuum is one-dimensional, then it must be indecomposable.
    0 references
    plane continuum
    0 references
    \(\epsilon \) -dense subcontinua
    0 references
    indecomposable continuum
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers