Birkhoff's representation theorem is equivalent to the axiom of choice (Q1820782): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: George Grätzer / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Elliott Mendelson / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: George Grätzer / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Elliott Mendelson / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q114694026 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: HSP K is equational class, without the axiom of choice / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Set theory. An introduction to independence proofs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5337203 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01190911 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W72257230 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 08:40, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Birkhoff's representation theorem is equivalent to the axiom of choice
scientific article

    Statements

    Birkhoff's representation theorem is equivalent to the axiom of choice (English)
    0 references
    1986
    0 references
    Birkhoff's Representation Theorem (BRT) states that every algebra is a subdirect product of subdirectly irreducible algebras. Let ZF\(^-\) be Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory without the axiom of foundation (AF) and without the axiom of choice (AC). Birkhoff's proof of (AC) \(\Rightarrow\) (BRT) can be carried out in ZF\(^-\). The author shows that the converse also is provable in \(ZF^-\). For this, he uses the result of H. Rubin and J. Rubin that, in ZF\(^-\), (AC) is implied by (AL 7): Every subalgebra is the intersection of all meet-irreducible subalgebras containing it as a subset. He shows that (BRT) \(\Rightarrow\) (AL 7) in ZF\(^-\). This is done with the help of the Congruence Lattice Representation Theorem: every algebraic lattice can be represented as the congruence lattice of an algebra. (It is shown how applications of (AC) can be eliminated from the usual proof of this theorem.) The author credits H. Andréka and I. Németi with pointing out to him that his original proof of (BRT) \(\Leftrightarrow\) (AC) in ZF\(^-+\)(AF) can be carried out in ZF\(^-\).
    0 references
    Birkhoff's Representation Theorem
    0 references
    subdirect product
    0 references
    subdirectly irreducible algebras
    0 references
    \(ZF^ -\)
    0 references
    Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory without the axiom of foundation
    0 references
    axiom of choice
    0 references
    Congruence Lattice Representation
    0 references
    algebraic lattice
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers