The MacLane problem on the set-theoretic foundation for category theory. II. (Q1400874): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claims |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Valeriy K. Zakharov / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Alexander V. Mikhalev / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Paul Bankston / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021941217859 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W198568404 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 08:48, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The MacLane problem on the set-theoretic foundation for category theory. II. |
scientific article |
Statements
The MacLane problem on the set-theoretic foundation for category theory. II. (English)
0 references
15 August 2003
0 references
[For part I, see ibid. 102, 4018--4031 (2000; Zbl 0970.18001).] After giving a historical summary of the various ways that axiomatic set theory has failed to provide a satisfactory foundation for naive category theory (e.g., how does one account for the category of all categories), the authors proceed to the syntax and axiomatics of an extension of NBG (von Neumann-Bernays-Gödel set theory), called the two-sorted multi-rank theory of classes and sets. They then proceed to show how naive category theory may be formulated within this framework and finally ask the question of whether their system is a conservative extension of NBG.
0 references
axiomatic set theory
0 references
foundations of naive category theory
0 references