Periods of 1-motives and transcendence. (Q1867435): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-314x(02)00002-1 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2035100180 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 09:06, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Periods of 1-motives and transcendence. |
scientific article |
Statements
Periods of 1-motives and transcendence. (English)
0 references
2 April 2003
0 references
A number of recent speculations deal with the open problem of finding all algebraic relations between periods [\textit{M. Kontsevich,} and \textit{D. Zagier}, B. Engquist (ed.) et al., Mathematics unlimited - 2001 and beyond. Berlin: Springer, 771--808 (2001; Zbl 1039.11002)]. A far reaching statement, generalizing previous conjectures by Schanuel and Grothendieck, has been proposed by \textit{Y. André} [Quelques conjectures de transcendance issues de la géométrie algébrique, Institut Mathématique de Jussieu, preprint 121 (1997)]. The author specializes André's conjecture to \(1\)-motives and shows that it is equivalent to a statement which she calls the elliptico-toric conjecture. She produces a number of special cases involving the classical exponential function, elliptic Weierstraß\ \(\wp\) and \(\zeta\) functions, elliptic integrals and the modular invariant.
0 references
Transcendence, algebraic independence, transcendence degree, Schanuel's conjecture, periods, \(1\)-motives, Grothendieck conjecture, de Rham cohomology, Mumford-Tate groups
0 references