Styles of physical thinking versus mathematical ones (Q1408668): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q587369 |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Volker Peckhaus / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022148016910 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2009612449 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 10:16, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Styles of physical thinking versus mathematical ones |
scientific article |
Statements
Styles of physical thinking versus mathematical ones (English)
0 references
25 September 2003
0 references
The author looks for specific features of physical reasoning, i.e., ``a cognitive activity that one could consider as specific to physics'' (p.\ 273). The role of mathematics in physics is seen in providing the way of seizing the measures of physical quantities and in structuring physical knowledge. Nevertheless, although it is impossible to dissociate physics from mathematics, physical reasoning should not be regarded as a special kind of mathematical reasoning. A ``deep act of physical research'' is, according to the author, ``the introduction of a new quantity. The circumstances of this act include in general the background of some model(s) together with some mathematical requirements on the range and the algebraic properties of the quantity to be introduced'' (p.\ 274). This hypothesis is illustrated by two historical case studies. The first concerns R.\ Clausius' introduction of the concept of entropy in 1854 being a mathematical representation of what he regarded as the true contents of Carnot's theorem. The second example concerns W. Heisenberg's setting the initial stage of quantum mechanics in matrix formulation. He faced the problem of providing a systematic way to associate (infinite) sequences of numbers (amplitudes) to a physical quantity in quantum theory. Both breakthroughs, the author concludes, ``depended crucially on the requirement of the consistency of the mathematical representation of the relevant physical quantities'' (p.\ 286).
0 references
mathematical modelling, physical reasoning
0 references
introduction of quantities
0 references