Remarks on ``Analysis of one popular group signature scheme'' in Asiacrypt 2006 (Q843367): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijact.2009.028030 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2115001462 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 10:42, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Remarks on ``Analysis of one popular group signature scheme'' in Asiacrypt 2006 |
scientific article |
Statements
Remarks on ``Analysis of one popular group signature scheme'' in Asiacrypt 2006 (English)
0 references
12 October 2009
0 references
Summary: \textit{Z. Cao} [in:Advances in cryptology -- ASIACRYPT 2006. 12th international conference on the theory and application of cryptology and information security, Shanghai, China, December 3--7, 2006. Proceedings. Berlin: Springer. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 4284, 460--466 (2006; Zbl 1172.94610)] presented a putative framing `attack' against the ACJT group signature scheme by Ateniese et al. This paper shows that the attack framework considered by Cao is invalid. As we clearly illustrate, there is no security weakness in the ACJT group signature scheme as long as all the detailed specifications of the original paper are being followed.
0 references
ACJT scheme
0 references
group signatures
0 references
public key cryptography
0 references
framing attack
0 references
security
0 references