Some moduli spaces of smooth complete intersections are quasi-projective (Q466911): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Harald Niederreiter / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Harald Niederreiter / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1111.1589 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W3101992922 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:44, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Some moduli spaces of smooth complete intersections are quasi-projective
scientific article

    Statements

    Some moduli spaces of smooth complete intersections are quasi-projective (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    31 October 2014
    0 references
    Let \(N\geq2\), \(1\leq c\leq N-1\) and \(2\leq d_1\leq \cdots\leq d_c\) be integers. Let \(H\) be the open subscheme of the appropriate Hilbert scheme of \({\mathbb P}^N_{\mathbb Z}\) parametrising smooth complete intersections of codimension \(c\) defined by homogeneous polynomials of degrees \(d_1,\cdots, d_c\). Except in the case \(c=1\), \(d_1=2\), the natural action of \(\text{PGL}_{N+1}\) on \(H\) is proper. A theorem of \textit{S. Keel} and \textit{S. Mori} [Ann. Math. (2) 145, No. 1, 193--213 (1997; Zbl 0881.14018)] shows the existence of a unique geometric quotient \(M\) of \(H\) by this action. This is a separated algebraic space of finite type over \(\text{Spec}({\mathbb Z})\). When \(c=1\) and \(d_1\geq3\), this was proved to be an affine scheme by Mumford and the proof extends easily to the case \(d_1=\cdots= d_c\) (Theorem 1.1(i)). The main purpose of this paper is to show that, if \(c\geq2\), \(d_1<d_2=\cdots= d_c\) and \(d_2(N-c+2)>d_1((c-1)(d_2-d_1)+1)\), then \(M\) is a quasi-projective scheme (Theorem 1.1 (ii)). The proof of Mumford depends on the observation that \(H\) is an open subset of a projective scheme whose complement (the discriminant divisor) is ample; hence \(H\) is affine and the result follows. This does not generalise to the case \(d_1<d_2=\cdots =d_c\); in fact, when \(c=2\), the discriminant divisor is never ample. However, \(H\) does admit an explicit compactification \(\overline{H}\); one can therefore apply GIT if one can find an ample divisor on \(\overline{H}\) such that all smooth complete intersections are stable. The restriction on degrees in the statement of (Theorem 1.1 (ii)) is required in order to prove the existence of this ample divisor.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    moduli spaces
    0 references
    complete intersections
    0 references
    geometric invariant theory
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references