How to improve a random number generator (Q1971517): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-4655(99)00434-8 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2166816996 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:49, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
How to improve a random number generator
scientific article

    Statements

    How to improve a random number generator (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    6 December 2000
    0 references
    Numerical experiments with random walking indicate the sensitivity of the results on the autocorrelation of the used (pseudo)random numbers. The author experiment with the double randomization technique. This technique uses one generator to produce a large array of random numbers. A second generator (not necesarily a different one) samples numbers from the array. Experiments are performed with various combinations of generators. The results of random walking experiments using the numbers are used as the indicator of the quality of such tools. The conclusion, not surprising, is that the quality depends mainly on the quality of the generator filling the array. One combination of generators has very good results. The paper presents no formal tests. All its conclusions are based on the diagrams showing graphically the results of the random walk experiments.
    0 references
    random number generation
    0 references
    autocorrelation
    0 references
    random walk
    0 references
    numerical examples
    0 references
    pseudo-random numbers
    0 references

    Identifiers