Exact controllability of the radial solutions of the semilinear wave equation in \(\mathbb{R}^3\) (Q1128215): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Luz de Teresa / rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Marian Ivanovici / rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Luz de Teresa / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Marian Ivanovici / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2151113516 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 10:06, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Exact controllability of the radial solutions of the semilinear wave equation in \(\mathbb{R}^3\) |
scientific article |
Statements
Exact controllability of the radial solutions of the semilinear wave equation in \(\mathbb{R}^3\) (English)
0 references
5 May 1999
0 references
The author considers the following semilinear equation \[ \begin{cases} y_{tt}- \Delta y+f(y)= h\chi_\omega &\text{in }\Omega\times (0,T),\\ y=0 &\text{on }\partial\Omega\times (0,T),\\ y(x,0)= y^0(x),\;y_t(x,0)= y^1(x) &\text{for }x\in\Omega, \end{cases} \tag{1} \] where \(\Omega\) is a bounded domain of \(\mathbb{R}^n\) with boundary \(\partial\Omega\) of class \(C^2\), \(\omega\subset \Omega\) a nonempty open subset, \(f\in C^1(\mathbb{R}^n)\), \(\{y^0,y^1\}\in H_0^1(\Omega)\times L^2(\Omega)\), and \(h(x,t)\in L^2(\omega\times (0,T))\) is a control function. The aim of this paper is to solve the problem of exact controllability: to find conditions on \(T\) and \(\omega\) such that for every \(\{y^0,y^1\}, \{z^0,z^1\}\in H_0^1(\Omega)\times L^2(\Omega)\) we can find a control \(h\in L^2(\omega\times (0,T))\) such that the corresponding solution \(y\) to (1) satisfies the following: \[ y(x,T)= z^0(x), \quad y_t(x,T)= z^1(x) \text{ for }x\in\Omega. \] Making a change of variables to spherical coordinates \(r=| x|\), this problem is reduced to the problem of exact controllability of the following wave equation in \(\mathbb{R}\): \[ \begin{cases} r^2y_{tt}- (r^2y_r)_r+ r^2f(y)- r^2h\chi_\omega &\text{ in }(0,1)\times (0,T),\\ y_r(0,t)= y(1,t)=0 &\text{ for }t\in (0,T),\\ y(r,0)= y^0(r),\;y_t(r,0)- y^1(r) &\text{ in }(0,1), \end{cases} \tag{2} \] where now \(\omega= (\ell_1,\ell_2)\subset \mathbb{R}\), \(y^0,y^1\) are functions of \(| x|\) and \(h\) is a function of \((| x|,t)\). The main result states that if \(T>2\max(\ell_1, 1-\ell_2)\) and \(f\in C^1(\mathbb{R})\) satisfies \[ | f(s)|\leq C| s|\cdot \bigl|\log^{p_0}| s| \bigr|+D, \] for some constants \(C,D>0\) and for some \(1\leq p_0<2\), then the system (2) is exactly controllable in time \(T\). The proof combines HUM and a fixed point technique. The HUM was introduced by J. L. Lions and is well known, whereas the fixed point method is presented in this work by five successive steps and the author obtains a suitable observability property for the linear wave equation with a particular potential.
0 references
semilinear equation
0 references
exact controllability
0 references
spherical coordinates
0 references
wave equation
0 references
HUM
0 references
fixed point method
0 references