On the decomposition of a representation of \(GL(3)\) restricted to \(GL(2)\) over a \(p\)-adic field (Q1210440): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Latest revision as of 10:11, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On the decomposition of a representation of \(GL(3)\) restricted to \(GL(2)\) over a \(p\)-adic field |
scientific article |
Statements
On the decomposition of a representation of \(GL(3)\) restricted to \(GL(2)\) over a \(p\)-adic field (English)
0 references
8 August 1993
0 references
Let \(F\) be a nonarchimedean local field. Consider irreducible admissible representations \(V\) of \(\text{GL}_N(F)\) and \(W\) of \(\text{GL}_{n- 1} (F)\). By restriction \(V\) is also a \(\text{GL}_{n - 1} (F)\)-module. A theorem of Bernstein asserts that the dimension of the space \(\text{Hom}_{\text{GL}_{n-1} (F)} (V,W)\) is at most one. The present paper is concerned with the question which pairs \((V,W)\) do have nonzero homomorphisms. A complete answer in terms of induced representations and, via Langlands-correspondence, in terms of Weil group representations is given for the case \(W = \mathbb{C}\) and \(n =3\). A conjecture for \(n > 3\) is stated. It further is proven that there are always homomorphisms if \(V\) and \(W\) are generic, i.e. possess unique Whittaker models.
0 references
nonarchimedean local field
0 references
irreducible admissible representations
0 references
restriction
0 references
induced representations
0 references
Weil group representations
0 references
Whittaker models
0 references
0 references