New mean value theorems for polyanalytic functions (Q1905278): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A theorem of Fédoroff / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Analyticity and the Pompeiu problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Offbeat Integral Geometry / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3353339 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5629972 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3892486 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Automorphic systems of scalar fields / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Uniqueness theorems for multiple lacunary trigonometric series / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02362407 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2031871524 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:14, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
New mean value theorems for polyanalytic functions
scientific article

    Statements

    New mean value theorems for polyanalytic functions (English)
    0 references
    8 January 1996
    0 references
    In the paper under review the functions obeyed to the mean value formula for the polyanalytic functions on the circles of some fixed radii are investigated. Namely, the author considers the next problem: let \(n\) be a fixed natural number, \(f \in C (\mathbb{C})\) and let, for a fixed \(r > 0\) and all \(z \in \mathbb{C}\), the following equality be valid: \[ \iint_{K (z,r)} (\zeta - z)^n f(\zeta) d \xi d \eta = 0 \quad (\zeta = \xi + i \eta) \] where \(K(z,r) = \{\zeta \in \mathbb{C} : |\zeta - z |\leq r\}\). It is true that \(f\) is \(n\)-analytic (i.e., \((\partial/ \partial \zeta)^n f = 0)\)? In the paper some essentially stronger results than the ``two radii'' Zalcman theorem [[\textit{L. Zalcman}, Arch. Rat. Mech. Analysis. 47, 237-254 (1972; Zbl 0251.30047)]) and also its analogy for the bounded domain are obtained. Also some special cases are considered, when the equation for the mean values is approximately valid but nevertheless, it allows to make conclusion of the function polyanalyticity under certain conditions.
    0 references
    0 references
    Bessel inequality
    0 references
    Bessel functions
    0 references
    polyanalytic functions
    0 references
    Zalcman theorem
    0 references

    Identifiers