Nonmyopic sensor scheduling and its efficient implementation for target tracking applications (Q2500911): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4023085 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/asp/2006/31520 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2065948537 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 10:29, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Nonmyopic sensor scheduling and its efficient implementation for target tracking applications |
scientific article |
Statements
Nonmyopic sensor scheduling and its efficient implementation for target tracking applications (English)
0 references
28 August 2006
0 references
Summary: We propose two nonmyopic sensor scheduling algorithms for target tracking applications. We consider a scenario where a bearing-only sensor is constrained to move in a finite number of directions to track a target in a two-dimensional plane. Both algorithms provide the best sensor sequence by minimizing a predicted expected scheduler cost over a finite time-horizon. The first algorithm approximately computes the scheduler costs based on the predicted covariance matrix of the tracker error. The second algorithm uses the unscented transform in conjunction with a particle filter to approximate covariance-based costs or information-theoretic costs. We also propose the use of two branch-and-bound-based optimal pruning algorithms for efficient implementation of the scheduling algorithms. We design the first pruning algorithm by combining branch-and-bound with a breadth-first search and a greedy-search; the second pruning algorithm combines branch-and-bound with a uniform-cost search. Simulation results demonstrate the advantage of nonmyopic scheduling over myopic scheduling and the significant savings in computational and memory resources when using the pruning algorithms.
0 references