A note involving \(p\)-valently Bazilević functions (Q2570928): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1990680417 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:30, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A note involving \(p\)-valently Bazilević functions
scientific article

    Statements

    A note involving \(p\)-valently Bazilević functions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    31 October 2005
    0 references
    This paper proves a rather complex looking condition to obtain a similarly complex conclusion. However, this reviewer believes that there must be a defect in the theorem. The authors consider a class \(A_n(p)\) of functions of the form \(f(z) = z^p + \sum_{k=n+p}^\infty a_k z^k\) which are analytic and \(p\)-valent in the unit disc. Their main theorem states that if \(f \in A_n(p)\), \(\beta \geq 0\), \(0 \leq \alpha < p\), \(w\) is a non-zero complex number, and \(g(z)\) is a \(p\)-valent starlike function in \(A_n(p)\) and if given conditions are satisfied, then \(| [(zf'(z)/[f(z)] ^{1 - \beta}[g(z)]^\beta) - p]^w| < p-\alpha\). Unfortunately, none of the conditions in the theorem involve \(\alpha\), so the quantity \(p - \alpha\) can be arbitrarily close to zero. Since the proof of the theorem seems to be correct, it appears to the reviewer that the conditions (2.2) and (2.3) of the theorem can never be satisfied unless \([f(z)]^{1 - \beta}[g(z)]^\beta) = f(z) = z^p\).
    0 references
    \(p\)-valent functions
    0 references

    Identifiers