A note on the strong core of a market with indivisible goods (Q1057768): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On cores and indivisibility / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Weak versus strong domination in a market with indivisible goods / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Core and competitive equilibria with indivisibilities / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(84)90017-x / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2163100237 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:57, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A note on the strong core of a market with indivisible goods
scientific article

    Statements

    A note on the strong core of a market with indivisible goods (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    \textit{L. S. Shapley} and \textit{H. E. Scarf} [ibid. 1, 23-37 (1974; Zbl 0281.90014)] studied a market where each agent i owns one indivisible good \(w_ i\), hence resources are \(w=(w_ 1,w_ 2,...,w_ n)\). Each agent has preferences among \(w_ i\), but does not desire more than one good. An allocation \(x=(x_ 1,x_ 2,...,x_ n)\) is a permutation of w. A competitive allocation is defined as usual with a price vector: each agent obtains the good which is best in his budget. An allocation is in the strong core if no coalition can weakly improve by only trading among themselves (at least one agent gets better off and not necessarily all). It is shown in this note that the strong core (which may be empty) is a subset of the competitive allocations, using the method of ''top trading cycles'' as introduced in the above-mentioned paper. An example shows that (normal) core allocations need not be competitive.
    0 references
    indivisible goods
    0 references
    competitive allocation
    0 references
    strong core
    0 references
    top trading cycles
    0 references

    Identifiers