A note on the strong core of a market with indivisible goods (Q1057768): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On cores and indivisibility / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Weak versus strong domination in a market with indivisible goods / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Core and competitive equilibria with indivisibilities / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(84)90017-x / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2163100237 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 10:57, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A note on the strong core of a market with indivisible goods |
scientific article |
Statements
A note on the strong core of a market with indivisible goods (English)
0 references
1984
0 references
\textit{L. S. Shapley} and \textit{H. E. Scarf} [ibid. 1, 23-37 (1974; Zbl 0281.90014)] studied a market where each agent i owns one indivisible good \(w_ i\), hence resources are \(w=(w_ 1,w_ 2,...,w_ n)\). Each agent has preferences among \(w_ i\), but does not desire more than one good. An allocation \(x=(x_ 1,x_ 2,...,x_ n)\) is a permutation of w. A competitive allocation is defined as usual with a price vector: each agent obtains the good which is best in his budget. An allocation is in the strong core if no coalition can weakly improve by only trading among themselves (at least one agent gets better off and not necessarily all). It is shown in this note that the strong core (which may be empty) is a subset of the competitive allocations, using the method of ''top trading cycles'' as introduced in the above-mentioned paper. An example shows that (normal) core allocations need not be competitive.
0 references
indivisible goods
0 references
competitive allocation
0 references
strong core
0 references
top trading cycles
0 references