Unconditionally secure disjointness tests for private datasets (Q1017546): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q59485023, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1707303357582 |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijact.2009.023471 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2075833250 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 11:00, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Unconditionally secure disjointness tests for private datasets |
scientific article |
Statements
Unconditionally secure disjointness tests for private datasets (English)
0 references
12 May 2009
0 references
Summary: We present two unconditional secure protocols for private set disjointness tests. In order to provide intuition of our protocols, we give a naive example that applies Sylvester matrices. Unfortunately, this simple construction is insecure as it reveals information about the intersection cardinality. More specifically, it discloses its lower bound. By using the Lagrange interpolation, we provide a protocol for the honest-but-curious case without revealing any additional information. Finally, we describe a protocol that is secure against malicious adversaries. In this protocol, a verification test is applied to detect misbehaving participants. Both protocols require \(O(1)\) rounds of communication. Our protocols are more efficient than the previous protocols in terms of communication and computation overhead. Unlike previous protocols whose security relies on computational assumptions, our protocols provide information theoretic security. To our knowledge, our protocols are the first ones that have been designed without a generic secure function evaluation. More important, they are the most efficient protocols for private disjointness tests in the malicious adversary case.
0 references
private matching
0 references
private set disjointness
0 references
secret sharing
0 references
secure multiparty computation
0 references
information theoretic security
0 references
cryptography
0 references
unconditional secure protocols
0 references
honest-but-curious
0 references
malicious adversaries
0 references