Game of thrones: accommodating monetary policies in a monetary union (Q1651876): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q130205721, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1726323884171
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/g9010009 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2776526015 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Fiscal Devaluations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: How important is fiscal policy cooperation in a currency union? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Coordination and Crisis in Monetary Unions* / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Dynamic modelling of monetary and fiscal cooperation among nations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A simple model of imperfect competition where 4 are few and 6 are many / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: OPTGAME3: A Dynamic Game Solver and an Economic Example / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q130205721 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:28, 14 September 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Game of thrones: accommodating monetary policies in a monetary union
scientific article

    Statements

    Game of thrones: accommodating monetary policies in a monetary union (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    10 July 2018
    0 references
    Summary: In this paper, we present an application of the dynamic tracking games framework to a monetary union. We use a small stylized nonlinear three-country macroeconomic model of a monetary union to analyze the interactions between fiscal (governments) and monetary (common central bank) policy makers, assuming different objective functions of these decision makers. Using the OPTGAME algorithm, we calculate solutions for several games: a noncooperative solution where each government and the central bank play against each other (a feedback Nash equilibrium solution), a fully-cooperative solution with all players following a joint course of action (a Pareto optimal solution) and three solutions where various coalitions (subsets of the players) play against coalitions of the other players in a noncooperative way. It turns out that the fully-cooperative solution yields the best results, the noncooperative solution fares worst and the coalition games lie in between, with a broad coalition of the fiscally more responsible countries and the central bank against the less thrifty countries coming closest to the Pareto optimum.
    0 references
    dynamic game
    0 references
    feedback Nash equilibrium
    0 references
    Pareto solution
    0 references
    monetary union
    0 references
    macroeconomics
    0 references
    public debt
    0 references
    coalitions
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references