On cyclotomic factors of polynomials related to modular forms (Q2631627): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q130198241, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1728694978566 |
||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q130198241 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 02:22, 12 October 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On cyclotomic factors of polynomials related to modular forms |
scientific article |
Statements
On cyclotomic factors of polynomials related to modular forms (English)
0 references
15 May 2019
0 references
In the paper the authors consider an infinite family of polynomials \((P_{n}(z))_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\) defined via the Taylor expansion \[ \prod_{m=1}^{\infty}(1-q^{m})^{-z}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}P_{n}(z)q^{n}. \] Here \(z\) is treated as a complex variable. The values of \(P_{n}(z)\) at integers have deep arithmetic meaning. In particular, the question of vanishing at negative integers of \(P_{m}(z)\) is of great interest. Indeed, if \(-z\in\mathbb{N}\), then the value \(P_{n}(z)\) is the \(n\)-th coefficient in the power series expansion of the \(-z\)-th power of the Euler product \(\prod_{m=1}^{\infty}(1-q^{m})\). The authors are interested in vanishing of \(P_{m}(z)\) at the roots of unity and as the main result prove that there is no pair of positive integers \((N,m)\) with \(N\geq 3\) such that \(\Phi_{N}(X)|P_{m}(X)\) (in the polynomial ring \(\mathbb{Z}[X]\)). Here, as usual, \(\Phi_{N}(X)\) denotes the \(N\)-th cyclotomic polynomial.
0 references
Fourier coefficients
0 references
Dedekind eta function
0 references
integer-valued polynomials
0 references
cyclotomic polynomials
0 references