A new weighted correlation coefficient method to evaluate reconstructed brain electrical sources (Q442837): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Created claim: DBLP publication ID (P1635): journals/jam/ChoiKFLJ12, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1731475607626 |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q58906470 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/251295 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2059183046 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Generalized Cross-Validation as a Method for Choosing a Good Ridge Parameter / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DBLP publication ID | |||
Property / DBLP publication ID: journals/jam/ChoiKFLJ12 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 06:32, 13 November 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A new weighted correlation coefficient method to evaluate reconstructed brain electrical sources |
scientific article |
Statements
A new weighted correlation coefficient method to evaluate reconstructed brain electrical sources (English)
0 references
6 August 2012
0 references
Summary: Various inverse algorithms have been proposed to estimate brain electrical activities with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). To validate and compare the performances of inverse algorithms, many researchers have used artificially constructed EEG and MEG data sets. When the artificial sources are reconstructed on the cortical surface, accuracy of the source estimates has been difficult to evaluate. We suggest a new measure to evaluate the reconstructed EEG/MEG cortical sources more accurately. To validate the usefulness of the proposed method, comparison between conventional and proposed evaluation metrics was conducted using artificial cortical sources simulated under different noise conditions. The simulation results demonstrated that only the proposed method could reflect the source space geometry regardless of the number of source peaks.
0 references