Pitch correlogram clustering for fast speaker identification (Q2570287): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Created claim: DBLP publication ID (P1635): journals/ejasp/JhanwarR04, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1731475607626 |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q56945774 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DBLP publication ID | |||
Property / DBLP publication ID: journals/ejasp/JhanwarR04 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 07:05, 13 November 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Pitch correlogram clustering for fast speaker identification |
scientific article |
Statements
Pitch correlogram clustering for fast speaker identification (English)
0 references
28 October 2005
0 references
Summary: Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) are commonly used in text-independent speaker identification systems. However, for large speaker databases, their high computational run-time limits their use in online or real-time speaker identification situations. Two-stage identification systems, in which the database is partitioned into clusters based on some proximity criteria and only a single-cluster GMM is run in every test, have been suggested in literature to speed up the identification process. However, most clustering algorithms used have shown limited success, apparently because the clustering and GMM feature spaces used are derived from similar speech characteristics. This paper presents a new clustering approach based on the concept of a pitch correlogram that captures frame-to-frame pitch variations of a speaker rather than short-time spectral characteristics like cepstral coefficient, spectral slopes, and so forth. The effectiveness of this two-stage identification process is demonstrated on the IVIE corpus of 110 speakers. The overall system achieves a run-time advantage of 500\% as well as a 10\% reduction of error in overall speaker identification.
0 references
speaker identification
0 references
clustering
0 references
pitch
0 references
correlogram
0 references