A two-phase data envelopment analysis model for portfolio selection (Q1929910): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Created claim: DBLP publication ID (P1635): journals/jamds/LengacherC12, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1731543907597
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2062495360 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q58697858 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Information systems project prioritization using data envelopment analysis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R\&D projects with interactions: a DEA based methodology / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Methodology for Collective Evaluation and Selection of Industrial R&D Projects / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DBLP publication ID
 
Property / DBLP publication ID: journals/jamds/LengacherC12 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 01:40, 14 November 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A two-phase data envelopment analysis model for portfolio selection
scientific article

    Statements

    A two-phase data envelopment analysis model for portfolio selection (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    10 January 2013
    0 references
    Summary: When organizations do not have well defined goals and constraints, traditional mixed integer programming (MIP) models are ineffective for portfolio selection. In such cases, some organizations revert to building project portfolios based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) relative efficiency scores. However, implementing the \(k\) most efficient projects until resources are expended will not always result in the most efficient portfolio. This is because relative efficiency scores are not additive. Instead, the efficiency of each candidate portfolio must be evaluated against all possible portfolios, making for a computationally intensive task. This paper has two main contributions to the literature. First, we introduce a new DEA-MIP model which can identify the most efficient portfolio capable of meeting organizational goals at incremental resource levels. Second, by utilizing a second-stage DEA model to calculate the relative effectiveness of each most efficient portfolio, we provide managers, a tool for justifying budget increases or defending existing budget levels.
    0 references
    mixed integer programming
    0 references
    second-stage DEA model
    0 references

    Identifiers