A two-phase data envelopment analysis model for portfolio selection (Q1929910): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q58697858, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1711626644914 |
Created claim: DBLP publication ID (P1635): journals/jamds/LengacherC12, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1731543907597 |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Information systems project prioritization using data envelopment analysis / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R\&D projects with interactions: a DEA based methodology / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A Methodology for Collective Evaluation and Selection of Industrial R&D Projects / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DBLP publication ID | |||
Property / DBLP publication ID: journals/jamds/LengacherC12 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 01:40, 14 November 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A two-phase data envelopment analysis model for portfolio selection |
scientific article |
Statements
A two-phase data envelopment analysis model for portfolio selection (English)
0 references
10 January 2013
0 references
Summary: When organizations do not have well defined goals and constraints, traditional mixed integer programming (MIP) models are ineffective for portfolio selection. In such cases, some organizations revert to building project portfolios based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) relative efficiency scores. However, implementing the \(k\) most efficient projects until resources are expended will not always result in the most efficient portfolio. This is because relative efficiency scores are not additive. Instead, the efficiency of each candidate portfolio must be evaluated against all possible portfolios, making for a computationally intensive task. This paper has two main contributions to the literature. First, we introduce a new DEA-MIP model which can identify the most efficient portfolio capable of meeting organizational goals at incremental resource levels. Second, by utilizing a second-stage DEA model to calculate the relative effectiveness of each most efficient portfolio, we provide managers, a tool for justifying budget increases or defending existing budget levels.
0 references
mixed integer programming
0 references
second-stage DEA model
0 references
0 references