Computing Gröbner bases of pure binomial ideals via submodules of \(\mathbb Z^n\) (Q432760): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.jsc.2011.12.046 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / review text
 
This paper is about the computation of Gröbner bases of lattice ideals, that is binomial ideals of the form \(\langle x^u - x^v : u-v \in L\rangle\), where \(L\subset \mathbb{Z}^n\) is an integer lattice. It is obvious that the notion of a Gröbner basis can be defined combinatorially, and that computations can be done in \(\mathbb{Z}^n\) [\textit{R. Hemmecke} and \textit{P. N. Malkin}, J. Symb. Comput. 44, No. 10, 1463--1476 (2009; Zbl 1200.13048)]. Instead of working with the lattice \(L\subset \mathbb{Z}^n\), the present paper suggest to use a presentation \(F: \mathbb{Z}^m \to L \to 0\) and work in the presentation. Their method builds on a sign-consistent decomposition of \(L\) and Hilbert basis computations for the respective cones. There are theoretical reasons for the author's observation that this yields no interesting results or computational speed-ups: Gröbner bases of toric ideals (the argument also works for lattice ideals) have an exponential degree bound [\textit{B. Sturmfels}, Tôhoku Math. J., II. Ser. 43, No. 2, 249--261 (1991; Zbl 0714.14034)], while merely determining the size of a Hilbert basis is \#P-complete and NP-hard [\textit{M. Hermann, L. Juban} and \textit{P. G. Kolaitis}, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1705, 13--32 (1999; Zbl 1044.11631)]. The paper also uses notions subtly different from those established in the literature. In particular, in computational algebraic geometry an ideal \(I\subset k[x_1,\dots,x_n]\) is \textit{saturated} if \(I:\langle x_1,\dots,x_n\rangle = I\). The authors use the term for \(\left( I:\prod_{i=1}^n x_i\right ) = I\). A binomial ideal such that \(\left( I:\prod_{i=1}^n x_i\right ) = I\) is usually called a \textit{lattice ideal} and although the title suggests much more, the methods in the paper are restricted to this case. Anybody interested in the computation of Gröbner bases of lattice ideals should read Hemmecke/Malkin, [loc. cit.] instead.
Property / review text: This paper is about the computation of Gröbner bases of lattice ideals, that is binomial ideals of the form \(\langle x^u - x^v : u-v \in L\rangle\), where \(L\subset \mathbb{Z}^n\) is an integer lattice. It is obvious that the notion of a Gröbner basis can be defined combinatorially, and that computations can be done in \(\mathbb{Z}^n\) [\textit{R. Hemmecke} and \textit{P. N. Malkin}, J. Symb. Comput. 44, No. 10, 1463--1476 (2009; Zbl 1200.13048)]. Instead of working with the lattice \(L\subset \mathbb{Z}^n\), the present paper suggest to use a presentation \(F: \mathbb{Z}^m \to L \to 0\) and work in the presentation. Their method builds on a sign-consistent decomposition of \(L\) and Hilbert basis computations for the respective cones. There are theoretical reasons for the author's observation that this yields no interesting results or computational speed-ups: Gröbner bases of toric ideals (the argument also works for lattice ideals) have an exponential degree bound [\textit{B. Sturmfels}, Tôhoku Math. J., II. Ser. 43, No. 2, 249--261 (1991; Zbl 0714.14034)], while merely determining the size of a Hilbert basis is \#P-complete and NP-hard [\textit{M. Hermann, L. Juban} and \textit{P. G. Kolaitis}, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1705, 13--32 (1999; Zbl 1044.11631)]. The paper also uses notions subtly different from those established in the literature. In particular, in computational algebraic geometry an ideal \(I\subset k[x_1,\dots,x_n]\) is \textit{saturated} if \(I:\langle x_1,\dots,x_n\rangle = I\). The authors use the term for \(\left( I:\prod_{i=1}^n x_i\right ) = I\). A binomial ideal such that \(\left( I:\prod_{i=1}^n x_i\right ) = I\) is usually called a \textit{lattice ideal} and although the title suggests much more, the methods in the paper are restricted to this case. Anybody interested in the computation of Gröbner bases of lattice ideals should read Hemmecke/Malkin, [loc. cit.] instead. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Thomas Kahle / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 13P10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6053106 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
binomial ideal
Property / zbMATH Keywords: binomial ideal / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Gröbner basis
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Gröbner basis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
polyhedral cone
Property / zbMATH Keywords: polyhedral cone / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Hilbert basis
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Hilbert basis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: Normaliz / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: CoCoA / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: 4ti2 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: Publication / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsc.2011.12.046 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2094542436 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3533404 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Polytopes, Rings, and K-Theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A note on the problem of reporting maximal cliques / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Binomial ideals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Computing generating sets of lattice ideals and Markov bases of lattices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3818127 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Gröbner bases of lattices, corner polyhedra, and integer programming / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Geometric Buchberger Algorithm for Integer Programming / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.JSC.2011.12.046 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Revision as of 18:25, 9 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Computing Gröbner bases of pure binomial ideals via submodules of \(\mathbb Z^n\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Computing Gröbner bases of pure binomial ideals via submodules of \(\mathbb Z^n\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    4 July 2012
    0 references
    This paper is about the computation of Gröbner bases of lattice ideals, that is binomial ideals of the form \(\langle x^u - x^v : u-v \in L\rangle\), where \(L\subset \mathbb{Z}^n\) is an integer lattice. It is obvious that the notion of a Gröbner basis can be defined combinatorially, and that computations can be done in \(\mathbb{Z}^n\) [\textit{R. Hemmecke} and \textit{P. N. Malkin}, J. Symb. Comput. 44, No. 10, 1463--1476 (2009; Zbl 1200.13048)]. Instead of working with the lattice \(L\subset \mathbb{Z}^n\), the present paper suggest to use a presentation \(F: \mathbb{Z}^m \to L \to 0\) and work in the presentation. Their method builds on a sign-consistent decomposition of \(L\) and Hilbert basis computations for the respective cones. There are theoretical reasons for the author's observation that this yields no interesting results or computational speed-ups: Gröbner bases of toric ideals (the argument also works for lattice ideals) have an exponential degree bound [\textit{B. Sturmfels}, Tôhoku Math. J., II. Ser. 43, No. 2, 249--261 (1991; Zbl 0714.14034)], while merely determining the size of a Hilbert basis is \#P-complete and NP-hard [\textit{M. Hermann, L. Juban} and \textit{P. G. Kolaitis}, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1705, 13--32 (1999; Zbl 1044.11631)]. The paper also uses notions subtly different from those established in the literature. In particular, in computational algebraic geometry an ideal \(I\subset k[x_1,\dots,x_n]\) is \textit{saturated} if \(I:\langle x_1,\dots,x_n\rangle = I\). The authors use the term for \(\left( I:\prod_{i=1}^n x_i\right ) = I\). A binomial ideal such that \(\left( I:\prod_{i=1}^n x_i\right ) = I\) is usually called a \textit{lattice ideal} and although the title suggests much more, the methods in the paper are restricted to this case. Anybody interested in the computation of Gröbner bases of lattice ideals should read Hemmecke/Malkin, [loc. cit.] instead.
    0 references
    0 references
    binomial ideal
    0 references
    Gröbner basis
    0 references
    polyhedral cone
    0 references
    Hilbert basis
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers