On the Błocki-Zwonek conjectures and beyond (Q500860): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Normalize DOI.
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S00013-015-0810-1 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S00013-015-0810-1 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 19:37, 9 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the Błocki-Zwonek conjectures and beyond
scientific article

    Statements

    On the Błocki-Zwonek conjectures and beyond (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 October 2015
    0 references
    Let \(\Omega \subset \mathbb C^n\) be a bounded pseudoconvex domain and \(g_{\Omega} (\cdot, a)\) its pluricomplex Green function with a pole at a point \(a \in \Omega\). The following two conjectures are due to Z. Błocki and W. Zwonek: {\parindent=8mm \begin{itemize} \item[(C1)] The function \(\alpha (t):= e^{-2nt}\lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is nondecreasing on \((-\infty,0)\) \item [(C2)] The function \(\beta (t):= \log ( \lambda_n(\{g_\Omega (\cdot ,a) <t\}) \) is convex on \((-\infty,0)\). \end{itemize}} Here, \(\lambda_n\) denotes the Lebesgue measure. J. E. Fornæss has disproved (C2) by means of a triply connected domain in the plane, so the above conjectures will not hold in general. But the authors prove them under the hypothesis that \(\Omega \) is balanced. After this they consider the analogues of the functions \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) for the Green function with two poles in the case that \(\Omega\) is a planar domain. They disprove (C1) and (C2) in this case.
    0 references
    pluricomplex Green function
    0 references
    Bergman kernel
    0 references
    Błocki-Zwonek conjectures
    0 references

    Identifiers