Artificial language in ancient Mesopotamia -- a dubious and a less dubious case (Q509756): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s10781-005-8169-4 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Correction of the M?dhava Series for the Circumference of a Circle / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Jacobus de Florentia,<i>Tractatus algorismi</i>(1307), the chapter on algebra (Vat. Lat. 4826, fols 36<sup>v</sup>-45<sup>v</sup>) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A note on Old Babylonian computational techniques / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3221954 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5829770 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Reading Strasbourg 368: A Thrice-Told Tale / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The algebra of Master Dardi of Pisa / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S10781-005-8169-4 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 19:53, 9 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Artificial language in ancient Mesopotamia -- a dubious and a less dubious case
scientific article

    Statements

    Artificial language in ancient Mesopotamia -- a dubious and a less dubious case (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    17 February 2017
    0 references
    It has been claimed that artificial language can be found in the cuneiform documents from Mesopotamia [\textit{O. Neugebauer}, Vorlesungen über Geschichte der antiken mathematischen Wissenschaften. I: Vorgriechische Mathematik. Berlin: J. Springer (1934; JFM 60.0002.01), pp. 68--72] in the sense that the logographic writing of Babylonian mathematical tablets can be read like (modern) symbolic algebra. The author gives a short overview of the development of this algebra. He then shows by carefully interpreting a few Babylonian mathematical texts that these do not make use of artificial language (or symbolic algebra), even if they have a very stereotyped terminology. By contrast the very creation of cuneiform writing was directed towards an artificial language that was meant to reliably organise and keep economic records, and thus to establish and develop a bureaucratic order. Only after some centuries of use was the writing applied to represent spoken language.
    0 references
    artificial language
    0 references
    cuneiform writing system
    0 references
    Babylonian mathematics
    0 references
    symbolic algebra
    0 references

    Identifiers