Multiple genus 2 Heegaard splittings: a missed case (Q541312): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Normalize DOI. |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.2140/agt.2011.11.1781 / rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Martin G. Scharlemann / rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Martin G. Scharlemann / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / review text | |||
It was shown independently in [\textit{M. Boileau} and \textit{J.-P. Otal}, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I 303, 19--22 (1986; Zbl 0596.57010)] and [\textit{C. Hodgson} and \textit{J. H. Rubinstein}, in: Knot theory and manifolds, Proc. Conf., Vancouver/Can. 1983, Lect. Notes Math. 1144, 60--96 (1985;Zbl 0605.57022)] that any two genus-one Heegaard decompositions of a given 3-manifold are isotopic. In contrast, some Seifert manifolds have distinct genus-two Heegaard splittings. In [Geom. Topol. Monogr. 2, 489--553 (1999; Zbl 0962.57013)], \textit{H. Rubinstein} and \textit{M. Scharlemann} gave a near-complete list of ways in which multiple splittings could be constructed. In the paper reviewed here, the authors fill a gap in this earlier work by describing a final class of examples omitted from the list of Rubinstein and Scharlemann. The examples have some interesting new properties not shared by the examples in Rubinstein and Scharlemann's paper. In particular, at least some of the new examples are of Hempel distance 3, whereas all of the examples in the original work were of Hempel distance 2. | |||
Property / review text: It was shown independently in [\textit{M. Boileau} and \textit{J.-P. Otal}, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I 303, 19--22 (1986; Zbl 0596.57010)] and [\textit{C. Hodgson} and \textit{J. H. Rubinstein}, in: Knot theory and manifolds, Proc. Conf., Vancouver/Can. 1983, Lect. Notes Math. 1144, 60--96 (1985;Zbl 0605.57022)] that any two genus-one Heegaard decompositions of a given 3-manifold are isotopic. In contrast, some Seifert manifolds have distinct genus-two Heegaard splittings. In [Geom. Topol. Monogr. 2, 489--553 (1999; Zbl 0962.57013)], \textit{H. Rubinstein} and \textit{M. Scharlemann} gave a near-complete list of ways in which multiple splittings could be constructed. In the paper reviewed here, the authors fill a gap in this earlier work by describing a final class of examples omitted from the list of Rubinstein and Scharlemann. The examples have some interesting new properties not shared by the examples in Rubinstein and Scharlemann's paper. In particular, at least some of the new examples are of Hempel distance 3, whereas all of the examples in the original work were of Hempel distance 2. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Cynthia L. Curtis / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 57N10 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 57M15 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 5904615 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
3-manifold | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: 3-manifold / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Heegaard splitting | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Heegaard splitting / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Heegaard decompositon | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Heegaard decompositon / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Hempel distance | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Hempel distance / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2135452356 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / arXiv ID | |||
Property / arXiv ID: 0910.3921 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: 3-manifolds as viewed from the curve complex / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The classification of punctured-torus groups / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4486730 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Berge's distance 3 pairs of genus 2 Heegaard splittings / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Heegaard splittings of \((\text{surface})\times I\) are standard / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The disjoint curve property and genus 2 manifolds / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.2140/AGT.2011.11.1781 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 20:58, 9 December 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Multiple genus 2 Heegaard splittings: a missed case |
scientific article |
Statements
Multiple genus 2 Heegaard splittings: a missed case (English)
0 references
7 June 2011
0 references
It was shown independently in [\textit{M. Boileau} and \textit{J.-P. Otal}, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I 303, 19--22 (1986; Zbl 0596.57010)] and [\textit{C. Hodgson} and \textit{J. H. Rubinstein}, in: Knot theory and manifolds, Proc. Conf., Vancouver/Can. 1983, Lect. Notes Math. 1144, 60--96 (1985;Zbl 0605.57022)] that any two genus-one Heegaard decompositions of a given 3-manifold are isotopic. In contrast, some Seifert manifolds have distinct genus-two Heegaard splittings. In [Geom. Topol. Monogr. 2, 489--553 (1999; Zbl 0962.57013)], \textit{H. Rubinstein} and \textit{M. Scharlemann} gave a near-complete list of ways in which multiple splittings could be constructed. In the paper reviewed here, the authors fill a gap in this earlier work by describing a final class of examples omitted from the list of Rubinstein and Scharlemann. The examples have some interesting new properties not shared by the examples in Rubinstein and Scharlemann's paper. In particular, at least some of the new examples are of Hempel distance 3, whereas all of the examples in the original work were of Hempel distance 2.
0 references
3-manifold
0 references
Heegaard splitting
0 references
Heegaard decompositon
0 references
Hempel distance
0 references