Is Weibull distribution the correct model for predicting probability of failure initiated by non-interacting flaws? (Q545046): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.09.033 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.09.033 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2004631641 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Statistical Theory for the Fracture of Brittle Structures Subjected to Nonuniform Polyaxial Stresses / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5607813 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3259350 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4875312 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5804568 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2008.09.033 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:05, 9 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Is Weibull distribution the correct model for predicting probability of failure initiated by non-interacting flaws?
scientific article

    Statements

    Is Weibull distribution the correct model for predicting probability of failure initiated by non-interacting flaws? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    22 June 2011
    0 references
    Weibull distribution
    0 references
    weakest-link concept
    0 references
    brittle fracture
    0 references
    flaws
    0 references
    failure
    0 references
    local approach
    0 references
    statistical theory of fracture
    0 references

    Identifiers