Is Weibull distribution the correct model for predicting probability of failure initiated by non-interacting flaws?

DOI10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.09.033zbMath1215.74005OpenAlexW2004631641MaRDI QIDQ545046

M. T. Todinov

Publication date: 22 June 2011

Published in: International Journal of Solids and Structures (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.09.033

zbMATH Keywords

brittle fracturefailureWeibull distributionflawslocal approachstatistical theory of fractureweakest-link concept

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Theories of fracture and damage (74A45) Stochastic and other probabilistic methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S60)

Related Items (4)

Topology optimisation of repairable flow networks for a maximum average availability ⋮ The cumulative stress hazard density as an alternative to the Weibull model ⋮ Statistical characterization of meso-scale uniaxial compressive strength in brittle materials with randomly occurring flaws ⋮ Estimation of strengths in large annealed glass panels

Cites Work

• A Statistical Theory for the Fracture of Brittle Structures Subjected to Nonuniform Polyaxial Stresses
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Is Weibull distribution the correct model for predicting probability of failure initiated by non-interacting flaws?