The cumulative stress hazard density as an alternative to the Weibull model
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:619956)
Recommendations
- Is Weibull distribution the correct model for predicting probability of failure initiated by non-interacting flaws?
- Cumulative Damage Models for System Failure with Application to Carbon Fibers and Composites
- Properties of the Weibull cumulative exposure model
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3936709
- Statistical Failure Prediction Models for Brittle Materials.
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3141621 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3329716 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3065425 (Why is no real title available?)
- Is Weibull distribution the correct model for predicting probability of failure initiated by non-interacting flaws?
Cited in
(6)- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5913413 (Why is no real title available?)
- Equations and a fast algorithm for determining the probability of failure initiated by flaws
- Properties of the Weibull cumulative exposure model
- Is Weibull distribution the correct model for predicting probability of failure initiated by non-interacting flaws?
- Estimation of strengths in large annealed glass panels
- Is Weibull's modulus really a material constant? Example case with interacting collinear cracks
This page was built for publication: The cumulative stress hazard density as an alternative to the Weibull model
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q619956)