Weaving \(K\)-frames in Hilbert spaces (Q722506): Difference between revisions

Frames in a Hilbert space were introduced by \textit{R. J. Duffin} and \textit{A. C. Schaeffer} [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 72, 341--366 (1952; Zbl 0049.32401)]. Motivated by examples arising from sampling theory in [``Atomic system for subspaces'', in: Proceedings of the international conference on sampling theory and applications, SampTA 2001. 163--165 (2001); \url{https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans_Feichtinger/publication/2857251_Atomic_Systems_for_Subspaces/links/0912f50b0749dad8ac000000.pdf}], \textit{H. G. Feichtinger} and \textit{T. Werther} introduced a family of analysis and synthesis systems with frame like properties for closed subspaces of Hilbert spaces. These systems were termed as atomic systems or local atoms. In [Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 32, No. 1, 139--144 (2012; Zbl 1230.42038)], \textit{L. Găvruţa} studied atomic systems with reference to a bounded linear operator \(K\) on a Hilbert space \(\mathcal{H}\). These are called \(K\)-frames. In [Oper. Matrices 10, No. 4, 1093--1116 (2016; Zbl 1358.42025)], \textit{T. Bemrose} et al. introduced the notion of weaving frames motivated by a problem in distributed signal processing. In the paper under review, the authors introduce and study weaving \(K\)-frames. The authors give some necessary and sufficient conditions for weaving \(K\)-frames. One of the main results of the paper states that woven \(K\)-frames and weakly woven \(K\)-frames are equivalent.