Defining ``good'' and ``bad'' in terms of ``better'' (Q918529): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Normalize DOI. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1093635338 / rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093635338 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2026013977 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1305/NDJFL/1093635338 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 08:14, 10 December 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Defining ``good'' and ``bad'' in terms of ``better'' |
scientific article |
Statements
Defining ``good'' and ``bad'' in terms of ``better'' (English)
0 references
1990
0 references
This paper deals with the conceptual relations between classificatory value concepts (such as `good' and `bad') on the one hand and comparative relations (`is better than') on the other. In particular, the author discusses a series of conditions for potential definitions of the classificatory concepts in terms of the (apparently ``more fundamental'') preference relations.
0 references
classificatory value concepts
0 references
comparative relations
0 references
preference relations
0 references