A minimum dimensional counterexample to Ganea's conjecture (Q989114): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2010.06.009 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.TOPOL.2010.06.009 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 11:50, 10 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A minimum dimensional counterexample to Ganea's conjecture
scientific article

    Statements

    A minimum dimensional counterexample to Ganea's conjecture (English)
    0 references
    27 August 2010
    0 references
    Let us recall that the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category of a space \(X\), \(\text{cat}\,X\), is one less than the minimal number of open subspaces of \(X\) contractible in \(X\) that are necessary to cover \(X\). In 1971, Ganea conjectured that \(\text{cat}(X\times S^n)=\text{cat}\,X + 1\) for any finite CW-complex and \(n\geq 1\). By results of Jessup and Hess this is true for rational spaces, but not in general. The first counterexample has been given by Iwase in 1998. The lowest dimension of all the known counterexamples was 10, while Vandembroucq proved that there is no counterexample in dimension \(\leq 5\). The main result of this paper is the production of a counterexample \(T\) in dimension 7. The space \(T\) is quite simple, \(T = S^2\vee S^6\cup_f e^7\) for some particular \(f\). We have \(\text{cat}\,T=2\) and \(\text{cat}(T\times S^r)= 2\) for \(r\geq 2\). The proof is based on the possibility of factoring a Hopf invariant stably.
    0 references
    0 references
    Ganea's conjecture
    0 references
    Lusternik-Schnirelmann category
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers