Counterexamples to a conjecture of Lemmermeyer (Q1291142): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Normalize DOI.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s000130050319 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2011031404 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: math/9808146 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S000130050319 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:34, 10 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Counterexamples to a conjecture of Lemmermeyer
scientific article

    Statements

    Counterexamples to a conjecture of Lemmermeyer (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    4 October 1999
    0 references
    Let \(K\) be a quadratic number field, and let \(L\) be an unramified \(2\)-extension of \(K\) which is normal over \(\mathbb Q\) (the Hilbert \(2\)-class field of \(K\) has this property). By Chebotarev's monodromy theorem, \(\Gamma = \text{Gal}(L/\mathbb Q)\) is generated by involutions (elements of order \(2\)); in particular, \(G = \text{Gal}(L/K)\) is a subgroup of index \(2\) in \(\Gamma\). Let us say that a \(2\)-group \(G\) has property P if \(G\) is a subgroup of index \(2\) in a group generated by involutions. In an unpublished manuscript, the reviewer conjectured that every finite \(2\)-group has property P; clearly finite abelian \(2\)-groups do. In this paper, the authors show by a computation using the MAGMA databases that exactly two out of the \(267\) groups of order \(64\) do not have property P, and then go on to construct infinitely many counterexamples by hand.
    0 references
    2-groups
    0 references
    involutions
    0 references
    class field towers
    0 references
    quadratic number fields
    0 references

    Identifiers