Deformations of a hyperbolic 3-manifold not affecting its totally geodesic boundary (Q1321778): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q588445
Normalize DOI.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.2996/kmj/1138039851 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Emil Molnár / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2996/kmj/1138039851 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1995747505 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On totally geodesic boundaries of hyperbolic 3-manifolds / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Rigidity of cusps in deformations of hyperbolic 3-orbifolds / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Elastic waves in rods and clad rods / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.2996/KMJ/1138039851 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 18:06, 10 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Deformations of a hyperbolic 3-manifold not affecting its totally geodesic boundary
scientific article

    Statements

    Deformations of a hyperbolic 3-manifold not affecting its totally geodesic boundary (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    16 March 1995
    0 references
    Following a method of \textit{R. Brooks} [Invent. Math. 86, 461--469 (1986; Zbl 0578.30037)] the author constructs an orientable hyperbolic manifold having 12 cusps, furthermore 4 totally geodesic boundary components, each of them being isometric to a given hyperbolic surface of genus 2. Then he deforms the structure, analogously to the Dehn surgery, so that the surgered structure becomes a hyperbolic orbifold with cone type singularities of angle \(4\alpha\) \((0 < \alpha < (\pi/6))\) at the former cusps, but the boundary components metrically do not change. The reviewer remarks with surprise that the method essentially relies on the regular partition of the hyperbolic plane \(H^ 2\) just as V. S. Makarov, I. S. Gutsul (and their colleagues in Kishinev) had already constructed some hyperbolic groups, manifolds, etc. by this method (see the review of the paper by \textit{V. S. Makarov} [Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 193, 143--147 (1993); translation from Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 193, 132--136 (1992; Zbl 0808.52016)]; note, that in this review labels \(m_ 0\) and \(m_ 3\) for the left and right node of the diagram are missing). The author's construction is based on the regular partition of \(H^ 2\) by dodecagons, 3 meet at each vertex. Then he builds prismatic solid over each dodecagon with an upper face, first, parallel with the side faces, and 12 truncating faces perpendicular to two adjacent side faces and to the upper faces. So we get vertices at the infinity (cusps) with rectangles on the corresponding horospheres. Second, the upper face forms an angle \(\alpha \in (0, (\pi/6))\) with the side faces. In the reviewer's summary of the paper by V. S. Makarov (see Zbl 0808.52016), the constructions of Makarov are based on the existence of hyperbolic Coxeter groups with diagrams \[ \vcenter{\vtop{=.35 \line{\(m_ 0\)\hss\(m_ 1\)\hss\(m_ 2\)} \vskip-.5\baselineskip \line{\hss12\hss\hss3\hss} \vskip-.5\baselineskip \line{\(\bigcirc\)\cleaders\hbox{--}\hfil\(\bigcirc\)\cleaders\hbox{-- }\hfil\(\bigcirc\)} \line{\hglue.375em\vrule height5ex width2pt \hss \vrule height5ex width2pt\hglue.425em} \vskip-.4\baselineskip \line{\(\bigcirc\)\cleaders\hbox{-}\hfil\(\bigcirc\)\cleaders\hbox{- }\hfil\(\bigcirc\)} \line{\(n_{12}\)\hss\(n_ 3\)\hss\(n_{01}\)} }} \quad \text{resp.} \quad \vcenter{\vtop{=.35 \line{\(m_ 0\)\hss\(m_ 1\)\hss\(m_ 2\)} \vskip-.5\baselineskip \line{\hss12\hss\hss3\hss} \vskip-.5\baselineskip \line{\(\bigcirc\)\cleaders\hbox{--}\hfil\(\bigcirc\)\cleaders\hbox{-- }\hfil\(\bigcirc\)} \line{\hglue.375em \vbox to 5ex{\cleaders\hbox{\vrule height1ex depth-.25ex}\vfil} \hss \vrule height5ex \hglue.425em} \vskip- .4\baselineskip \line{\(\bigcirc\)\cleaders\hbox{- }\hfil\(\bigcirc\)\cleaders\hbox{-}\hfil\(\bigcirc\)} \line{\(n_{0}\)\hss\(n_ 3\)\hss\(m_{3}\)} }} \quad{\pi \over 2\alpha} \] Here thick lines indicate parallel planes (as usual), broken lines refer to ultraparallel planes with common perpendicular (see the review on Makarov's paper). In the reviewer's opinion Dehn surgery makes a compact manifold from a manifold at cusps, in the original sense. The author's construction would be much more interesting if he could show his phenomenon in the title under such circumstances.
    0 references
    deformation
    0 references
    hyperbolic 3-manifold
    0 references
    geodesic boundary
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references