Singularities of low degree complete intersections (Q1692607): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.4310/MAA.2017.v24.n1.a7 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: Publication / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.4310/maa.2017.v24.n1.a7 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4253074510 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.4310/MAA.2017.V24.N1.A7 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 04:01, 11 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Singularities of low degree complete intersections
scientific article

    Statements

    Singularities of low degree complete intersections (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    10 January 2018
    0 references
    Log canonical singularities is expected to be the largest class of singularities for the minimal model conjecture to hold. Typical examples of a log canonical singularity is the vertex of the projective cone over a smooth hypersurface of degree \(d\leq n+1\) in \(\mathbb{P}^n\). In this article, the author provides a generalization of the previous example for complete intersections to have log canonical singularities: Let \(X\subseteq\mathbb{P}^N\) be an irreducible complete intersection of multidegree \((d_1,\dots, d_r)\). If \(\dim\text{Sing}(X)\leq N-\sum_id_i\), then \(X\) is log canonical. Indeed, this condition is sharp, cf. Theorem 1.4 (ii). The proof utilize the theory of Du Bois singularities, since a normal Gorenstein singularity is log canonical iff it is Du Bois. The advantage is that for complete varieties to be Du Bois, instead of going back to the original local definition via Du Bois complex, one can simply check it cohomologically (numerically Du Bois), cf. Theorem 2.3. The proof of theorem then follows easily by a cohomology computation.
    0 references
    0 references
    singularities
    0 references
    Du Bois
    0 references
    log canonical
    0 references
    complete intersections
    0 references

    Identifiers