Discrete admissibility and exponential dichotomy for evolution families (Q1865964): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.383 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Christian Poetzsche / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Christian Poetzsche / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2003.9.383 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2083389642 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.3934/DCDS.2003.9.383 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 10:53, 16 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Discrete admissibility and exponential dichotomy for evolution families
scientific article

    Statements

    Discrete admissibility and exponential dichotomy for evolution families (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 March 2004
    0 references
    Here, the authors study connections between admissibility and uniform exponential dichotomy for discrete and continuous evolution families. In the discrete case, they show that, for an evolution family with uniform exponential growth, an exponential dichotomy is equivalent to the admissibility of the pair \((c_0(X),c_{00}(X))\), where \(X\) is a Banach space and the sequence spaces \(c_0(X)=\{s:{\mathbb Z}_+\rightarrow X: \lim_{n\to\infty}s(n)=0\}\), \(c_{00}(X)=\{s\in c_0(X): s(0)=0\}\) are endowed with the sup-norm. Having this result at hand, the authors are able to give a new proof of an admissibility theorem due to \textit{Nguyen Van Minh, F. Räbiger} and \textit{R. Schnaubelt} [Integral Equations Oper. Theory 32, 332--353 (1998; Zbl 0977.34056)]. This theorem states that, in a continuous setting, the uniform exponential dichotomy of a strongly continuous evolution family is equivalent to the admissibility of the pairs \((C_0(X),C_0(X))\) and \((C_0(X),C_{00}(X))\), respectively, with \(C_0(X)=\{s:{\mathbb R}_+\rightarrow X: \lim_{t\to\infty}s(t)=0\}\), \(C_{00}(X)=\{s\in C_0(X): s(0)=0\}\) equipped with the sup-norm.
    0 references
    evolution family
    0 references
    uniform exponential dichotomy
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references