Relative difference sets (Q5917788): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1006/jcta.1996.0044 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2009119025 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1006/JCTA.1996.0044 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:46, 16 December 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 883808
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Relative difference sets
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 883808

    Statements

    Relative difference sets (English)
    0 references
    9 July 1996
    0 references
    The authors rediscover the well-known existence of cyclic relative difference sets with parameters \((q + 1, 2, q, (q - 1)/2)\), where \(q\) is an odd prime power. The existence of this series (Theorem 2 in their paper) follows directly by applying the standard projection argument of \textit{J. E. H. Elliott} and \textit{A. T. Butson} [Relative difference sets, Ill. J. Math. 10, 517-531 (1966; Zbl 0145.01503)] to the well-known affine difference sets due to \textit{R. C. Bose} [An affine analogue of Singer's theorem, J. Indian Math. Soc., n. Ser. 6, 1-15 (1942; Zbl 0063.00542)] which are constructed in their Theorem 1 (which is incorrectly attributed to Elliott and Butson). For an explicit reference for the existence of these RDS, see e.g. Corollary 4.4 in the reviewer's paper ``On automorphism groups of divisible designs'' [Can. J. Math. 34, 257-297 (1982; Zbl 0465.05011)]. Of course, this result was known even earlier, since the relative difference sets in question are equivalent to negacyclic conference matrices which were studied by \textit{P. Delsarte}, \textit{J. M. Goethals} and \textit{J. J. Seidel} [Orthogonal matrices with zero diagonal. II., Can. J. Math. 23, 816-832 (1971; Zbl 0209.03703)]. The reviewer also fails to see any point in the proof provided for Theorem 1, since the construction of Bose's affine difference sets given there is certainly no simpler than other known proofs (if it is new at all).
    0 references
    relative difference sets
    0 references
    conference matrices
    0 references

    Identifiers