A short intervals result for \(2n\)-twin primes in arithmetic progressions (Q1961888): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Normalize DOI.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.21099/tkbjm/1496163866 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.21099/tkbjm/1496163866 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1546033632 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.21099/TKBJM/1496163866 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:39, 16 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A short intervals result for \(2n\)-twin primes in arithmetic progressions
scientific article

    Statements

    A short intervals result for \(2n\)-twin primes in arithmetic progressions (English)
    0 references
    29 March 2000
    0 references
    Let \(I_{k,l}(2n)=\sum\log p_1\log p_2\), where the summation is taken over the pairs of primes \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) such that \(p_1-p_2=2n\), \(p_1\equiv l\) (mod \(k\)) and \(p_2<2n\). When \((l,k)=(2n-l,k)=1\), it is expected that \(I_{k,l}(2n)\sim 2nS_{k,l}(2n)/\varphi(k)\), as \(n\rightarrow\infty\), where \(\varphi(k)\) denotes Euler's totient function, and \[ S_{k,l}(2n)=2\prod_{p>2}\bigl(1-(p-1)^{-2}\bigr) \prod_{p|nk, p>2}\bigl((p-1)/(p-2)\bigr). \] Then the auther proves the following; Let \(A>0\) and \(0<\varepsilon<2/3\) be arbitrary constants, assume that \(N^{1/3+\varepsilon}\leq H\leq N\), and set \(S_{k,l}(2n)=0\) when \((2n-l,k)>1\). Then there exists a constant \(B=B(A)\) such that \[ \sum_{k\leq K(N)}\max_{(l,k)=1}\sum_{N<2n\leq N+H} \bigl|I_{k,l}(2n)-2nS_{k,l}(2n)/\varphi(k)\bigr|\ll HN(\log N)^{-A}, \] where \(K(N)=\min\{H(\log N)^{-2A-6},\sqrt{N}(\log N)^{-B}\}\), and the implied constant depends only on \(A\) and \(\varepsilon\). The author also considers a sum which is defined like \(I_{k,l}(2n)\), but the size of primes \(p_2\) is restricted to be smaller, roughly speaking. He establishes a similar result for the latter sum, which contains the above conclusion. The proof is based on the Hardy-Littlewood method, and requires various ideas which appeared in the research for this kind of problems.
    0 references
    twin primes
    0 references
    short intervals
    0 references
    arithmetic progressions
    0 references
    Euler's totient function
    0 references
    Hardy-Littlewood method
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers