Political mobilization in the laboratory: the role of norms and communication (Q2052510): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.3390/g12010024 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: N‐person Prisoner's Dilemma† / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Quantal response equilibria for normal form games / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Trust, reciprocity, and social history / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A theory of sequential reciprocity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Testing theories of fairness-intentions matter / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Voter turnout as a participation game: An experimental investigation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: Z-Tree / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/g12010024 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W3134374482 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.3390/G12010024 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:44, 16 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Political mobilization in the laboratory: the role of norms and communication
scientific article

    Statements

    Political mobilization in the laboratory: the role of norms and communication (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    26 November 2021
    0 references
    Summary: Many field experiments have shown that political mobilization increases voter turnout, with personalized strategies considerably outperforming widely administered ones. Despite the abundant evidence, there is no systematic explanation of what drives citizens' response to mobilization. In this paper, I propose and experimentally test in the laboratory a theoretical framework that investigates the psychological mechanisms underlying mobilization in both partisan and non-partisan settings. I conjecture that material mobilization efforts should increase participation because of reciprocity concerns. The transmission of normative appeals through interpersonal communication should have a similar effect by making a group norm salient. The results from two experiments show that the combination of a mobilization effort with a normative appeal leads to a significant and substantial increase in participation in both settings. Using content analysis, I show that this interaction effect is due to the way normative appeals are perceived when the sender is in charge of mobilization.
    0 references
    mobilization
    0 references
    political participation
    0 references
    laboratory experiment
    0 references
    norms
    0 references
    communication
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers