Quadratic residues of certain types (Q2477928): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1216/rmjm/1181069349 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2069725199 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3996190 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The proof of a conjecture of additive number theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Notes on small class numbers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3257846 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Complex Quadratic Fields with Class-Number Two / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5526173 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Exponents of the class groups of complex quadratic fields / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1216/RMJM/1181069349 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:30, 18 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Quadratic residues of certain types
scientific article

    Statements

    Quadratic residues of certain types (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    14 March 2008
    0 references
    In this paper, the author proves that if \(p\) is a prime not in \(\{2,3,5,7,13,37\}\), then there is a prime \(q\equiv 1\pmod 4\) which is smaller than \(p\) and is a quadratic residue modulo \(p\). He also proves a similar theorem for primes \(q\equiv 3\pmod 4\) except that now the list of forbidden values of \(p\) is \(\{2,3,5,7,17\}\). The proof of the first result combines clever elementary arguments with nonelementary results concerning Euler's convenient numbers, as well as the classification of imaginary quadratic fields of class number \(2\), while the proof of the second statement is elementary. The paper is well written and easy to read.
    0 references
    0 references
    quadratic residue
    0 references
    length
    0 references
    numerous idoneus
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references