Empathy (Q4834868): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
User1 (talk | contribs)
Changed claim: description (P1459): This dataset captures the relational behaviour of 1973 French-speaking students from several universities or schools for higher education in the following fields: engineering (31%), medicine (18%), nursing school (16%), economic sciences (15%), physiotherapy, (4%), psychology (11%), law school (4%) and dietetics (1%). The subjects were 17 to 25 years old (M = 19.6 years, SD = 1.6 years), 57% were females and 43% were males. The feature set is...
User1 (talk | contribs)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
description / endescription / en
Dataset published at Zenodo repository
Dataset in the Graphical Modelling and Causal Inference Zenodo Community.
Property / author
 
Property / author: David Reifferscheidt / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author: David Reifferscheidt / qualifier
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Oleksandr Zadorozhnyi / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author: Oleksandr Zadorozhnyi / qualifier
 

Latest revision as of 11:31, 18 April 2025

Dataset in the Graphical Modelling and Causal Inference Zenodo Community.
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Empathy
Dataset in the Graphical Modelling and Causal Inference Zenodo Community.

    Statements

    0 references
    28 February 2023
    0 references
    0 references
    This dataset captures the relational behaviour of 1973 French-speaking students from several universities or schools for higher education in the following fields: engineering (31%), medicine (18%), nursing school (16%), economic sciences (15%), physiotherapy, (4%), psychology (11%), law school (4%) and dietetics (1%). The subjects were 17 to 25 years old (M = 19.6 years, SD = 1.6 years), 57% were females and 43% were males. The feature set is composed of 28 items meant to assess the four following components: fantasy, perspective taking, empathic concern and personal distress. In the questionnaire, the items are shuffled; reversed items (items 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19) are present. Items are scored from 0 to 4, where “0” means “Doesn’t describe me very well” and “4” means “Describes me very well”; reverse-scoring is calculated afterwards. The questionnaires were anonymized. The reanalysis of the database in this retrospective study was approved by the ethical committee of the Erasmus Hospital. (Briganti et al., 2018)
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references