The Worpitzky-Pringsheim theorem on continued fractions (Q5948858): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1216/rmjm/1020171566 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2078926795 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Worpitzky's theorem on continued fractions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The geometry of Pringsheim's continued fractions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3889331 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Continued fractions with applications / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5828139 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5508382 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5792555 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1216/RMJM/1020171566 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 12:13, 9 December 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1672100
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The Worpitzky-Pringsheim theorem on continued fractions
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1672100

    Statements

    The Worpitzky-Pringsheim theorem on continued fractions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    12 November 2001
    0 references
    It has been an open question for a long time to determine when the limit circle case occurs in the Sleszynski - Pringsheim theorem. That is, if \(|b_n|\geq |a_n|+1\) for all \(n\), and thus \[ T_n(\mathbb D)\subseteq T_{n-1}(\mathbb D)\subseteq\dots\subseteq \mathbb D \] where \(\mathbb D\) is the unit disk and \[ T_n(z)={a_1\over b_1} {\quad\atop +} {a_2\over b_2} {\quad\atop +\dots +} {a_n\over b_n+z}, \] when will the radius \(r_n\) of \(T_n(\mathbb D)\) converge to a positive limit \(\widetilde r\)? This is obviously so if all \(a_n=a\) and \(b_n=b\) where the linear fractional transformation \(t(z)=a/(b+z)\) has two fixed points in the closure of \(\mathbb D\). In that case the repulsive fixed point is on the boundary of \(\mathbb D\), and \(\mathbb D\) contains a circle invariant under \(t\). It is also probably so if \(a_n\to a\) and \(b_n\to b\) fast enough, but this has not been proved. What is known is that \(|T_n^{-1}(\infty)|\to 1\) is necessary. In this paper Beardon brings attention to an old and hidden result by W. J. Thron: If \(\partial T_n(\mathbb D)\cap\partial\mathbb D\neq\emptyset\) for all \(n\) (\(\partial A\) denotes the boundary of a set \(A\)), then \[ \widetilde r=1/\left(2\prod_{k=1}^\infty |T_k^{-1}(\infty)|\right). \] He also gives a much simpler and more transparent proof of this result. The disadvantage is that it gives \(\widetilde r\) in terms of \(T_n^{-1}(\infty)\) instead of the quantities \(a_n\) and \(b_n\). Nevertheless, it gives insight in the old problem and a good starting point for further investigations. The main part of Beardon's paper is devoted to the limit point case where \(\widetilde r=0\). He finds useful bounds for the radii \(r_n\) of \(T_n(\mathbb D)\) which in turn give truncation error bounds for the continued fraction. His isometric circles of \(t_n(z)=(a_n/b_n+z)\) and its inverse \(t_n^{-1}\). In particular he proves that if \[ |b_n|\geq 1+\max\{|a_n|, \sqrt{|a_n|}\}\quad\text{for all }n, \] then \[ r_n\leq 1/\left(1+2\sum_{k=1}^n|a_k|^{-1/2}\right)\quad\text{for all }n. \]
    0 references

    Identifiers