Symmetry of a boundary integral operator and a characterization of a ball (Q5954277): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 23:47, 4 March 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1699462
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Symmetry of a boundary integral operator and a characterization of a ball
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1699462

    Statements

    Symmetry of a boundary integral operator and a characterization of a ball (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    14 February 2002
    0 references
    Let \[ K_\Omega f(x)= \frac{1}{\omega_n}\int_{\partial \Omega}\frac{\langle y-x,\nu(y)\rangle}{|y-x|^{n}}f(y) d\sigma(y), \qquad x\in \partial \Omega \] be the singular integral operator generated by the double layer potential of \(f\in L_2(\partial \Omega)\), where \(\Omega\) is a bounded domain in \(\mathbb{R}^n\). In the case where \(\Omega\) is \(C^1\), it is known that the operator \(K_\Omega\) may be self-adjoint only in the case of a ball, which follows from the fact that the condition \[ \langle y-x,\nu(y)\rangle=\langle x-y,\nu(y)\rangle \] providing the selfadjointness of the operator \(K_\Omega\) is valid for balls only [\textit{H. P. Boas}, Math. Ann. 248, 275-278 (1980; Zbl 0414.32002)]. The author shows that the same is valid in the case of Lipschitz domains. For such domains he also proves the statement \[ K_\Omega f\equiv 0 \quad \forall f\in L_2(\partial \Omega) \quad \text{with mean value zero} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad n=2 \;\text{and} \Omega \;\text{is a disc}. \]
    0 references
    singular integral operator
    0 references
    selfadjointness
    0 references

    Identifiers