The dynamics of a prey-predator model with impulsive state feedback control (Q864070): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.1301 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Qi-Shao Lu / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Miklos Farkas / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Qi-Shao Lu / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Miklos Farkas / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.1301 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2332809153 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.3934/DCDSB.2006.6.1301 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 05:59, 10 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The dynamics of a prey-predator model with impulsive state feedback control
scientific article

    Statements

    The dynamics of a prey-predator model with impulsive state feedback control (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    12 February 2007
    0 references
    The simplest classical Lotka-Volterra two-dimensional predator-prey system is considered with impulsive control. The control is applied in such a way that prey (pest) is reduced (by pesticide) when its quantity reaches a certain threshold level and predator (a natural enemy of the prey) is released at the same time. Conditions are given under which the system has an orbitally asymptotically stable periodic solution. Under certain conditions as the quantity of predator released is increased a period doubling bifurcation occurs. Numerical examples show that state dependent control is more effective than fixed time feedback control. It is also shown that by state dependent control the costs are lower.
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references