Iterative refinement methods for time-domain equalizer design (Q871447): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Created claim: DBLP publication ID (P1635): journals/ejasp/ArslanLCE06, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1731505720702
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q59212665 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4348513 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DBLP publication ID
 
Property / DBLP publication ID: journals/ejasp/ArslanLCE06 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 14:57, 13 November 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Iterative refinement methods for time-domain equalizer design
scientific article

    Statements

    Iterative refinement methods for time-domain equalizer design (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    19 March 2007
    0 references
    Summary: Commonly used time domain equalizer (TEQ) design methods have been recently unified as an optimization problem involving an objective function in the form of a Rayleigh quotient. The direct generalized eigenvalue solution relies on matrix decompositions. To reduce implementation complexity, we propose an iterative refinement approach in which the TEQ length starts at two taps and increases by one tap at each iteration. Each iteration involves matrix-vector multiplications and vector additions with \(2 \times 2\) matrices and two-element vectors. At each iteration, the optimization of the objective function either improves or the approach terminates. The iterative refinement approach provides a range of communication performance versus implementation complexity tradeoffs for any TEQ method that fits the Rayleigh quotient framework. We apply the proposed approach to three such TEQ design methods: maximum shortening signal-to-noise ratio, minimum intersymbol interference, and minimum delay spread.
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers