The obscurity of the equimultiples. Clavius' and Galileo's foundational studies of Euclid's theory of proportions (Q5944686): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Normalize DOI. |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s004070100037 / rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004070100037 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2469296254 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S004070100037 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 12:12, 9 December 2024
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1654958
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The obscurity of the equimultiples. Clavius' and Galileo's foundational studies of Euclid's theory of proportions |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1654958 |
Statements
The obscurity of the equimultiples. Clavius' and Galileo's foundational studies of Euclid's theory of proportions (English)
0 references
27 June 2002
0 references
Euclid's Elements contain two definitions of proportionality, described here as equimultiple and rational. In 1589, Christoph Clavius published his second edition of his commentary on the Elements, in which he took great pains to establish the equivalence of the two definitions for numbers. In 1641, Galileo began to compose a new dialogue to be added to Two New Sciences in which proportionality had an important role in a theory of motion. He put forward a new definition of proportionality, and, apparently influenced by Clavius, treated the equivalence issue. The author presents the work of both in great detail, providing both translations of key passages and commentary. He concludes with a discussion of how Galileo adapted his conception to physical contexts.
0 references
Euclid's proportionality
0 references
Clavius
0 references
Galileo
0 references