Dynamics in numerics: On two different finite difference schemes for ODEs (Q557701): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Latest revision as of 12:05, 10 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Dynamics in numerics: On two different finite difference schemes for ODEs |
scientific article |
Statements
Dynamics in numerics: On two different finite difference schemes for ODEs (English)
0 references
30 June 2005
0 references
For a special type of ordinary differential equation (ODE), namely a Kolmogorov type differential equation which models the population growth of single species, the authors compare, from the viewpoint of dynamical systems, two finite difference schemes: Euler's scheme and the so called integral approximation scheme, both applied on the unbounded interval \([0,\infty)\). By developing some general formulas, they discuss the stability of the common equilibrium, the periodic doubling bifurcations and their stability and the chaos in the both schemes. By comparing these formulas and some numerical examples, the authors find that the Euler scheme is better than the integral approximation scheme in terms of the stepsize parameter. The results proved in this paper involve some concepts from dynamical systems, like: topological chaos, Schwarzian derivative, periodic orbit, scrambled set, etc.
0 references
finite difference scheme
0 references
stability
0 references
equilibrium
0 references
periodic doubling
0 references
topological chaos
0 references
Schwarzian derivative
0 references
population growth
0 references
dynamical systems
0 references
Euler's scheme
0 references
integral approximation
0 references
bifurcations
0 references
numerical examples
0 references