Extensions of cut-and-choose fair division (Q677613): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s000170050007 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2063437772 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Splitting necklaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An Envy-Free Cake Division Protocol / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: How to Cut A Cake Fairly / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A note on cake cutting / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Note on the Fair Division Problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Ramsey partitions of integers and fair divisions / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 11:05, 27 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Extensions of cut-and-choose fair division
scientific article

    Statements

    Extensions of cut-and-choose fair division (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 April 1997
    0 references
    The ancient method of ``one cuts the other chooses'' for fair division has the attractive property that the noncutter has simply to chose a preferred piece. Here it is shown that a cake can be fairly divided between two players in any ratio using a (possibly infinite) sequence of such simple cut-and-choose steps requiring only a preference decision. The method is extended to any number of players and requirements for needing only finitely many cuts are discussed. Also, a modified method is given which always uses only a finite number of cuts and moreover appears to be quite efficient in terms of number of cuts used.
    0 references
    fair division
    0 references
    cut-and-choose steps
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references