Some binomial coefficient congruences (Q809118): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Betty Garrison / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Betty Garrison / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Binomial Coefficients Modulo a Prime / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Two \(p^ 3\) variations of Lucas' theorem / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:21, 21 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Some binomial coefficient congruences
scientific article

    Statements

    Some binomial coefficient congruences (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1991
    0 references
    \textit{É. Lucas} [Sur les congruences des nombres Eulériens et des coefficients différentiels des fonctions trigonométriques, suivant un module premier, Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 6, 49-54 (1878; JFM 10.0139.04)] has proved that if p is prime, \(n,r,n_ 0,r_ 0\) are nonnegative integers, \(n_ 0<p\), \(r_ 0<p\), then \(\left( \begin{matrix} np+n_ 0\\ rp+r_ 0\end{matrix} \right)\equiv \left( \begin{matrix} n\\ r\end{matrix} \right)\left( \begin{matrix} n_ 0\\ r_ 0\end{matrix} \right)(mod p)\). It is now proved that if p is prime, n,r,i are nonnegative integers, \(0<i<p\), then \[ \left( \begin{matrix} np\\ rp+i\end{matrix} \right)\equiv (r+1)\left( \begin{matrix} n\\ r+1\end{matrix} \right)\left( \begin{matrix} p\\ i\end{matrix} \right)(mod p^ 2). \] It is also shown that if \(p\geq 5\) is prime, \(i>0\), \(0\leq n\leq m\), \(0\leq k<p\), then \[ \left( \begin{matrix} mp^ 2\\ np^ 2+kp+i\end{matrix} \right)\equiv (n+1)\left( \begin{matrix} m\\ n+1\end{matrix} \right)\left( \begin{matrix} p^ 2\\ kp+i\end{matrix} \right)(mod p^ 3). \] The first proof proceeds by induction on n and the second by induction on m.
    0 references

    Identifiers