Removable sets for subharmonic functions (Q1587527): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2000.194.199 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2057770545 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 19:44, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Removable sets for subharmonic functions
scientific article

    Statements

    Removable sets for subharmonic functions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    3 December 2000
    0 references
    Let \(\Omega\) be an open set in \(\mathbb{R}^n, \) \(n \geq 2\) and \(X \subset \Omega\) a closed set contained in \(\Omega.\) Hayman and Kennedy proved that if \(f\) is a subharmonic bounded function in \(\Omega\) but not in \(E,\) and \(E\) is a polar, then \(f\) is a subharmonic extension to the set \(\Omega.\) Gardiner has shown that in the case of a compact exceptional set the boundedness condition can be relaxed by imposing certain smoothness and Hausdorff measure condition on the set. He also showed that his results are sharp. In this note the author points out that there exist results which are in a certain sense parallel to Gardiner's results but no smoothness conditions are necessary to impose on the exceptional set. As a matter of fact the author shows that results similar to Gardiner's hold when two conditions are changed by one geometric measure condition \(M^\alpha(E) =0\) where \(M^\alpha\) is the upper Minkowski content.
    0 references
    subharmonic functions
    0 references
    Hausdorff measure
    0 references
    geometric measure conditions
    0 references

    Identifiers