Planar diagrams (Q1848537): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Edouard Brézin / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Claude Itzykson / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Giorgio Parisi / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Jean-Bernard Zuber / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Chandra Shekhar Sharma / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Edouard Brézin / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Claude Itzykson / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Giorgio Parisi / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Jean-Bernard Zuber / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Chandra Shekhar Sharma / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Census of Planar Triangulations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4221096 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 18:23, 4 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Planar diagrams
scientific article

    Statements

    Planar diagrams (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    10 November 2002
    0 references
    The authors describe their method for counting planar Feynman diagrams of quantum field theory. Mathematicians who are not familiar with the current jargon of quantum field theory are likely to find this paper rather difficult to follow. In order to demonstrate the usefulness of their method, the authors calculate the ground state energy of a system of coupled anharmonic oscillators with a \(\phi^4\) interaction in the planar approximation. They obtain the value \(0.58993g^{1/3}\) in the limit of large \(g\), where \(g\) is the coupling constant. By comparing this with the value \(0.66799g^{1/3}\) which is described as exact, the authors conclude that the planar approximation is at most 12\% wrong!
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references